Thursday, May 9, 2013

Modern European Philosophy: Final Review


Multiple Choice: The multiple choice questions will cover the material from the lecture notes on my blog and the readings, below are listed the concepts and points with which you should be familiar.

Existentialism: Heidegger & setting sail, thrownness, Dasein, closed vs uncanny, revealing as concealing, horizon & death, dwelling vs fleeing, authenticity, metaphysics vs hermeneutics, focus & articulation, tools & social roles as extension of self, the unthought, issues & time, symbiosis of self & world, distancing, the They, moods, fear & anxiety, support of Nazis, Sartre & Camus, cafe waiter, racism, bad faith, de Beauvoir & woman as Other, Existential Feminism, Fanon & Postcolonialism

Logical Positivism: Comte & verified science vs opinion & nonsense, unified coherent science, three stages of history, Sociology & mathematics, Russell & axioms vs grounded mathematics, mathematicians vs philosophers, problem of induction, whittling down to universal principles, Wittgenstein & early logic vs the Vienna Circle, search for rhino, world as facts, oven & carbon, lure of the secret cellar, explanation vs description, subjective & objective together, language games & forms of life, rules variously interpreted, child at the blackboard, descriptions add complexity, Vienna Circle pamphlet, Ayer & weak verificationism, Common Language Movement & turn to common sense, Moore & the lights of Wheeler Hall

Unitarianism & Pragmatism: Mill & progressive rights, utilitarianism, long & social view, no hard sciences, no first principles, bad as good example, Pragmatism & late Wittgenstein, Peirce & belief as willing to act, fallibilism, three categories, James & no objective truth, functionalism, stream of consciousness, Dewey & progressive diverse education, truth vs inquiry, affecting & being affected, philosopher’s fallacy, three stages of history, Rorty & Neopragmatism, problem with the mirror metaphor, society as open conversation, taking metaphors too literally, similarity of early Heidegger & late Wittgenstein, West & master mappers, demythologizing theory, disconnected academia & activism

Philosophy of Science: Kuhn & paradigm shift, normal vs revolutionary science, textbooks normalize science, Popper & falsifiability, open society vs metaphysics, joke vs poker, Feyerabend & epistemological anarchism, democratization of science, localized practices, no unified pragmatic method, detailed human thought, “prescientific” as foot-binding, contradicting accepted theory, taboo reactions, separation of science and state, Latour & Antimodernism, outlying data & orthodox theory, Moderns, myth & idol of icy reason, Portuguese & African fetishes, Helvetius & equal mental capacity

Structuralism & Poststructuralism: Marx & social class, Freud & satisfaction vs repression, Saussure & signs, arbitrariness vs motivated onomatopoeia & portmanteau, Levi-Strauss & three loves, the practical & symbolic, relationships of relationships, exchange, totemism, mythemes, myth as expression of contradiction, debate with Sartre, Lacan & self-image, narcissism, paranoia, the Real, Barthes & the death of the author, criticism of the ‘natural’, wrestling, Operation Margarine, Paris Match cover, depoliticized speech, Foucault & distrusting binary oppositions & institutions, knowledge as power, the Panopticon, capillary level & marginalization

Postmodernism: Lyotard vs thought as language, metanarrative vs micronarratives, obsession with precision, cure vs symptom, Deleuze & identity as difference, repetition, concepts vs systems, ideals as useful, Marx & Freud as lenses, Baudrillard & consumption, nihilism, the Hyperreal, simulacra, ecstatic acceptance, Haraway & cyborgs, hybridity, Derrida & freeplay, incoherent center, recentering, ethnocentrism, scandal of incest, displacement, debate with Searle

Short Answers: Pick four topics from the list below.  For each of your choices, write a half page in each of the spaces provided.  You should demonstrate that you 1) understand the meaning of the concept, 2) that you can connect it to other material from the class, and 3) that you can apply it to examples.  If you demonstrate each of these three things and complete the required page length, you will get full points for your answer.

Heidegger’s Horizon        Heidegger’s Authenticity        Heidegger’s Unthought
Heidegger’s Symbiosis        Sartre’s Bad Faith        de Beauvoir’s Existential Feminism
Fanon’s Postcolonialism        Comte’s Sociology        Wittgenstein’s Oven
Wittgenstein’s Blackboard    Mill’s Utilitarianism        Peirce’s Pragmatism
James’ Functionalism        Dewey’s Philosopher’s Fallacy    Rorty’s Open Conversation
West’s Demythologizing Theory    Kuhn’s Paradigm Shift        Popper’s Falsifiability
Feyerabend’s Anything Goes    Saussure’s Arbitrariness        Levi-Strauss’ Symbolic
Lacan’s Self-Image        Barthes’ Death of the Author    Barthes’ Magazine Cover
Foucault’s Knowledge/Power    Foucault’s Panopticon        Lyotard’s Metanarrative
Deleuze’s Repetition        Baudrillard’s Hyperreal        Haraway’s Cyborgs
Derrida’s Freeplay        Derrida’s Scandal of Incest    Derrida vs Searle