For
each of the four response papers, you must write at least three typed
and double spaced pages on a topic of your choice that concerns the
material we have covered in the class so far. Do not spend time
summarizing the material, but rather focus on your own thoughts and
questions. You are welcome to use your own life experiences as well as
fictional and nonfictional material from outside class. While you are
welcome to reflect on anything you have found interesting, the following
are possible topics for your response.
1)
The two major Confucians after Confucius, Mencius and Xunzi, agree that
Confucius’ teachings are wise and that we should cultivate ourselves
through education and participating in society. However, they
completely disagree on whether human nature is good or evil. Mencius
argues that human nature is good, and education expands what we
originally are. Xunzi argues that human nature is evil, and society is
necessary to change us from what we originally are. Who do you find
yourself agreeing with more, and why?
2)
Mozi argues for universal love versus the Confucians such as Mencius
who argue that love is naturally varied depending on familiarity. Are
the two positions compatible? Is one more favorable than the other?
3)
Plato and Aristotle both argue that we should have a meritocracy and
elevate those who are more intelligent into a ruling class. Given that
authority is impossible, and that we want expert opinion but also must
avoid abuses of power, how should authority and expertise be utilized
such that it does not become abusive?
